Just go ahead and talk. Eeeyup.
First of all, thanks for the good work already done by you.
I noticed that you changed the Nictuku page according to the new section in Dark Ages 20. While this is, in itself, a legitimate change; the problem is that the whole V20 line is metaplot-agnostic, meaning that some events mentioned in the books might or might not have happened in every chronicle. In most cases in the wiki where previously established content is touched by these modifications, an additional heading is made, titled "V20 continuity", to signify deviations from the three base Editions.
In order to avoid confusion between the "canon" material from 1st Ed, 2nd Ed and Revised; and the V20 Dark Ages material, would it be okay for you if the Nictuku article is split accordingly, with the previous info standing as it was, and the V20 variation from V20 Dark Ages as an additional caption within the article?Sharth (talk) 18:20, October 19, 2015 (UTC)
Sharth, I created a new "Version Differences" section in the article, where we can address the subject you brought forth in this discussion. I ask you both to complement that section as you see fit, with info regarding the dramatic changes the bloodline has gone throughout the books. Russel Hammond (talk) 05:38, October 20, 2015 (UTC)