Forum:Antitribu

I'd like to hear thoughts on this. I've got a bunch of antitribu symbols ready to upload, but I was wondering what form our articles should take. Should we have an antitribu section on each individual clan page (so, fr'ex, Gangrel antitribu would be found at Gangrel (VTM)), or should we treat them like bloodlines and give each one their own page (such as Gangrel antitribu)? --Ian talk 02:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm all for as concise pages as possible, and considering the antitribu share much of their clan's history and such, I think its best made a subsection for each clan. Moogle001 05:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Sounds like a good idea to me. (Sorry, computer logged me out.) BebopKate 07:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree they don't need their own pages, but I do think clans with signifcant or distinct antitribu branches (like, say, Tremere, Setites or Gangrel) should have separate Bloodline and Antitribu sections (at present, most have a single "Bloodlines and Antitribu" section). -- Guybrush 10:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the comments, all. The antitribu page now links to various antitribu articles, such as Gangrel antitribu, but all the antitribu links themselves redirect to the antitribu sections in the parent clan articles. So Gangrel antitribu will redirect to the antitribu section on the Gangrel (VTM) page. All those antitribu sections now have their respective "clan" icons. Some are a bit lower-quality than I'd like, but I'll fix that once I get my Xmas scanner and I start digitizing the graphics in my WW books. (:
 * As it is, I believe think we're currently one of the best spots on the 'Net for getting good-sized images for a lot of the WW splats. Nowhere else I've found has all the Dark Ages or Sorcerer's Crusade stuff, fr'ex. Keep up the good work. (: --Ian talk 04:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)